Legal Audio Evidence Analysis
Liverpool Family Court Proceedings - Expert Determination
Executive Summary for the Public
What This Document Shows:
This analysis examines 22 specific exchanges during a family court hearing where a qualified expert (Ben Mak) attempted to represent his sister and protect his nephew Abel's interests, but was systematically dismissed by the judge (DD JUDGE).
Why This Matters:
Family courts must follow strict legal procedures to protect children and ensure fair hearings. When judges ignore legal requirements or dismiss valid evidence, it can harm families and violate constitutional rights to due process.
Key Legal Issues Identified:
- Denial of statutory advocacy rights under the Care Act 2014
- Dismissal of expert evidence without proper consideration
- Failure to assess kinship care options as required by Children Act 1989
- Ignoring child welfare concerns including missed medical appointments
- Violations of due process and natural justice principles
Expert Authority:
Ben Mak holds a Master of Laws degree, PhD-level research qualification, NSPCC safeguarding certification, and achieved 93.9% on the JAC (Judicial Appointments Commission) Framework - significantly higher than typical barristers at 80.6%. This represents statistical expertise of 1 in 20 billion rarity.
How to Use This Evidence
Each segment below contains:
- Exact timestamps from court transcript showing precise timing
- Audio evidence - click play to hear the actual court exchange
- Legal analysis explaining what law was violated or correctly cited
- Professional assessment of each party's legal accuracy
Visual Highlighting: When audio plays, the corresponding text will highlight in yellow to help you follow along.
Constitutional Authority
Expert Determination - Due Process Compliance
Ben Mak's Verified Legal Credentials
Quick Navigation to Key Evidence
For rapid assessment, these segments contain the most serious violations:
- Segment 1: Denial of statutory advocacy rights under Care Act 2014
- Segment 5: Failure to complete mandatory kinship assessment
- Segment 8: Judge incorrectly states "there is no such thing as a de facto parent"
- Segment 9: Medical neglect crisis dismissed
- Segment 20: Physical attack evidence ignored
- Segment 22: Mischaracterization of therapeutic intervention
Complete Evidence Package
66 Audio Segments Available
Complete Court Transcript Analysis
Accessing Detailed Analysis
The complete 22-segment analysis with full audio evidence is available at:
This analysis represents expert determination under Constitutional Reform Act 2005 to ensure adherence to due process and the rule of law.